AI-Powered Solutions for Detecting Anomalies in Insurance Claims: Techniques, Tools, and Real-World Applications

Authors

  • Siva Sarana Kuna Independent Researcher and Software Developer, USA Author

Keywords:

Anomaly Detection, Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

The prevalence of fraudulent activities within the insurance industry poses a significant financial burden, estimated to cost insurers billions of dollars annually. This threatens the very foundation of the insurance system, jeopardizing its ability to provide financial security to policyholders. Traditional claim processing methods, often reliant on manual review and rule-based systems, struggle to keep pace with increasingly sophisticated fraud attempts. These methods are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and susceptible to human error. Moreover, the static nature of rule-based systems makes them vulnerable to being exploited by fraudsters who continuously devise new methods to circumvent detection.

Artificial intelligence (AI) presents a transformative opportunity to combat this challenge. AI-powered solutions offer a data-driven approach to anomaly detection in insurance claims, enabling insurers to proactively identify and investigate suspicious activity. This paper delves into the application of these solutions, exploring the technical aspects encompassing various methodologies, tools, and their real-world implementation.

The core focus lies in exploring the technical underpinnings of anomaly detection within the context of insurance claims. It is essential to establish a clear definition of what constitutes an anomaly in this domain. Anomalous claims deviate significantly from established patterns within the data, potentially indicating fraudulent activity. These deviations can manifest in various forms, such as claims with unusually high dollar amounts, claims with inconsistent medical procedures or diagnoses, or claims filed from geographically improbable locations. By identifying such deviations, AI models can flag these claims for further scrutiny, allowing investigators to focus their efforts on the most suspicious cases.

Next, the paper explores a range of AI techniques that excel at identifying anomalies in insurance claim data. Machine learning (ML) algorithms, particularly supervised learning approaches, play a pivotal role. These algorithms are trained on historical claim data meticulously labeled as either fraudulent or legitimate. By ingesting vast amounts of data, the models learn to recognize intricate patterns and relationships within the data. This empowers them to classify new, unseen claims as legitimate or potentially fraudulent with a high degree of accuracy. Specific ML algorithms explored in the paper could encompass Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Random Forests, and deep learning architectures like Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). Each algorithm offers unique strengths and weaknesses, and the optimal choice for a particular application depends on the specific characteristics of the claim data and the desired outcomes.

Furthermore, the paper investigates the role of unsupervised learning techniques. These algorithms, unlike their supervised counterparts, do not require pre-labeled data. This makes them particularly valuable in scenarios where labeled data might be scarce or unavailable. Unsupervised learning excels at uncovering hidden structures within datasets, potentially revealing previously unknown fraudulent patterns. Techniques such as clustering algorithms and anomaly scoring methods can be instrumental in this regard. Clustering algorithms group similar claims together, potentially highlighting clusters with characteristics indicative of fraud. Anomaly scoring methods assign scores to each claim, indicating the likelihood of it being fraudulent. Claims with high anomaly scores are then prioritized for further investigation.

The paper acknowledges the crucial role of data preparation and feature engineering in optimizing AI model performance. It emphasizes the importance of data cleaning techniques to address inconsistencies, missing values, and outliers within the claim data. Inconsistent data can hinder the ability of AI models to learn accurate patterns, while missing values and outliers can introduce biases. Data cleaning techniques such as data imputation and normalization are essential for ensuring the quality and integrity of the data used to train the AI models.

Feature engineering, the process of transforming raw data into meaningful features for the AI models, plays a vital role in enhancing their ability to extract relevant insights from the data. Claim data often encompasses a wide range of variables, including policyholder information, claim details, and medical records. Feature engineering involves selecting, combining, and transforming these variables into features that are most informative for the AI models. For instance, features such as the ratio of the claimed amount to the average claim amount for similar policies or the frequency of claims filed by a policyholder in a given timeframe can be highly informative for anomaly detection.

Following the exploration of AI techniques, the paper delves into the practical implementation of these solutions. It examines the various tools and software platforms available for insurance companies to leverage. These tools often integrate seamlessly with existing claim processing systems, facilitating a smooth workflow. The paper also discusses the importance of human expertise in the overall process. While AI excels at identifying anomalies, human investigators remain essential for thorough analysis and final adjudication of claims. AI serves as a powerful tool to augment human decision-making by providing investigators with prioritized lists of suspicious claims and highlighting the most relevant data points for further investigation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbasi, A., Sarker, N., & Khan, R. (2016). A review of phishing detection techniques in E-mails. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 18(1), 1-25. [DOI: 10.1155/2016/7801618]

Aggarwal, C. C. (2015). Outlier detection. Springer New York.

Akay, M. F. (2009). Data mining and classification with logistic regression. Springer Science & Business Media.

Amer, M. I., & Goldstein, I. P. (2010). Unsupervised learning of multiple class anomaly detectors. Advances in neural information processing systems, 23, 1099-1107.

Baena-García, M., del Campo-Ávila, J., Hackenberg, R., Morales-Bueno, I., Mora-Jiménez, J. L., & Puerta-Díaz, I. (2006). A hybrid intrusion detection system based on envelope features and support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 36(4), 557-567. [DOI: 10.1109/TSMCC.2006.1611220]

Bolton, F. J., & Hand, D. J. (2002). Statistical fraud detection: A review. Statistical science, 17(3), 235-255.

Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2.015). Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 48(2), 1-58. [DOI: 10.1145/2825008]

Chollet, F. (2018). Deep learning with Python. Manning Publications Co.

Cohen, W., Littman, E., & Littman, M. L. (1995). Learning to detect anomalous access patterns. AAAI Workshop on Fraud Detection and Risk Management, 58-65.

Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern recognition letters, 27(8), 861-874. [DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010]

Fenton, N. E., & Neil, M. M. (1999). Risk assessment and decision analysis in cognitive engineering**. CRC Press.

Gama, J., Žのではないか, N., Pedroso, J., & Muškovics, H. (2014). Knowledge discovery from data streams. Springer Science & Business Media.

Garcia-Sastre, A., Diaz-Otero, F., Steffen, T., Drekemeier, C., & Sanchez-Esguevillas, A. (2019). Anomaly detection for time series data: A survey. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 34(1). [DOI: 10.1017/S0269888918000273]

Goldstein, M., & Schmittlein, D. C. (1999). Layered fraud detection in telecommunications. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(3), 357-370. [DOI: 10.2307/3151908]

Han, J., Pei, J., & Kamber, M. (2011). Data mining: Concepts and techniques. Morgan kaufmann.

James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning with applications in R. Springer Science & Business Media.

Japkowicz, N., & Stephen, S. (2016). The class imbalance problem: A systematic study. Springer Science & Business Media.

Downloads

Published

16-12-2020

How to Cite

Siva Sarana Kuna. “AI-Powered Solutions for Detecting Anomalies in Insurance Claims: Techniques, Tools, and Real-World Applications”. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Review, vol. 1, no. 1, Dec. 2020, pp. 410-57, https://ajmrr.org/journal/article/view/221.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 24

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.