Ethical and Legal Implications of Data Sharing in SaaS Laboratory Management Systems

Authors

  • Vicrumnaug Vuppalapaty Technical Architect, CodeScience Inc. USA Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55662/AJMRR.2024.5306

Keywords:

GDPR, HIPAA, SaaS, Software as a Service, Data Sharing, Legal Implications

Abstract

Over the years, the use of Software as a Service (SaaS) in a laboratory information management system has transformed sharing and management in the latter system. Such a transformation, however, brings along complex ethical and legal challenges for which scrutiny is supposed to be considered. Implication for adopting SaaS platforms includes fundamental concern about data privacy, security, and the overall integrity of scientific research.

The paper systematically analyses ethical and legal implications associated with data sharing through SaaS platforms in the management of laboratories. This thus revolves around the understanding of how these systems can handle key aspects such as data ownership, respect for privacy, and compliance with international laws, and the resultant effects these would have on respective stakeholders across the scientific community.

We, in this approach, have reviewed a wide range of literature, including fine details of case studies and views by experts, in light of current practices and challenges within SaaS-based laboratory management. We incorporate all these methods within the research to provide an integral view of the multidimensional ethical and legal landscaping, therefore delivering an approach with both depth and context to the analysis.

It was mainly, regarding informed consent, and a very complex legal challenge emphasized in this study for compliance with GDPR, along with data confidentiality, respectively, for compliance with HIPAA. The study focused on the non-existence or lack of uniformity of regulatory frameworks that can provide for the special characteristics of SaaS data management and cross-border data flows.

References

Singh, A., Sharma, S., Kumar, S. R., & Yadav, S. A. (2016, February). Overview of PaaS and SaaS and its application in cloud computing. In 2016 International Conference on Innovation and Challenges in Cyber Security (ICICCS-INBUSH) (pp. 172-176). IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICCS.2016.7542322

Berman, F., & Cerf, V. (2013). Who will pay for public access to research data? Science, 341(6146), 616-617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241625

Palos‐Sánchez, P. R., Arenas‐Márquez, F. J., & Aguayo-Camacho, M. (2017, January 1). Cloud Computing (SaaS) Adoption as a Strategic Technology: Results of an Empirical Study. Journal of Mobile Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2536040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2536040

Adjei, J. K. (2015). Explaining the role of trust in cloud computing services. Info, 17(1), 54-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/info-09-2014-0042

Dhirani, L. L., Mukhtiar, N., Chowdhry, B. S., & Newe, T. (2023). Ethical dilemmas and privacy issues in emerging technologies: a review. Sensors, 23(3), 1151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031151

Riso, B., Tupasela, A., Vears, D. F., Felzmann, H., Cockbain, J., Loi, M., & Rakic, V. (2017). Ethical sharing of health data in online platforms–which values should be considered? Life sciences, society, and policy, 13, 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-017-0060-z

Kaikkonen, T. (2019). SaaS Application Integration Challenges.

Regulation, P. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and making technological advances benefit all parties concerned without compromising ethical and legal standards. of the Council. Regulation (EU), 679, 2016.

Act, A. (1996). Health insurance portability and accountability act of 1996. Public law, 104, 191.

Pearson, S., & Benameur, A. (2010, November). Privacy, security, and trust issues arising from cloud computing. In 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (pp. 693-702). IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CloudCom.2010.66

Bartolini, C., Santos, C., & Ullrich, C. (2018). Property and the cloud. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 358-390.

Savolainen, S. (2023). Evaluating security and privacy of SaaS service.

Sousa, R., Peixoto, H., Abelha, A., & Machado, J. (2023, July). Implementing a Software-as-a-Service Strategy in Healthcare Workflows. In International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 347-356). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38333-5_35

Yadegaridehkordi, E., Nilashi, M., Shuib, L., & Samad, S. (2020). A behavioral intention model for SaaS-based collaboration services in higher education. Education and information technologies, 25, 791-816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09993-1

Farquhar, J., Michels, N., & Robson, J. (2020). Triangulation in industrial qualitative case study research: Widening the scope. Industrial Marketing Management, 87, 160-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.001

Abdulsalam, Y. S., & Hedabou, M. (2021). Security and privacy in cloud computing: technical review. Future Internet, 14(1), 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14010011

Liu, H., Wang, Y., Fan, W., Liu, X., Li, Y., Jain, S., & Tang, J. (2022). Trustworthy ai: A computational perspective. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 14(1), 1-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3546872

Reichenberger, J., Radix, A. K., Blechert, J., & Legenbauer, T. (2022). Further support for the validity of the social appearance anxiety scale (SAAS) in a variety of German-speaking samples. Eating and Weight Disorders-Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia, and Obesity, 27(3), 929-943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-021-01171-y

Muller, S. H., van Thiel, G. J., Mostert, M., & van Delden, J. J. (2023). Dynamic consent, communication and return of results in large-scale health data reuse: Survey of public preferences. Digital Health, 9, 20552076231190997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231190997

Goode, S., Lin, C., Tsai, J. C., & Jiang, J. J. (2015). Rethinking the role of security in client satisfaction with Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) providers. Decision Support Systems, 70, 73-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.12.005

Bezuidenhout, L. (2013). Data sharing and dual-use issues. Science and engineering ethics, 19, 83-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9298-7

Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510-1529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479366

Reamer, F. G. (2017). Evolving ethical standards in the digital age. Australian Social Work, 70(2), 148-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2016.1146314

Bos‐Brouwers, H. E. J. (2010). Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities in practice. Business strategy and the environment, 19(7), 417-435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.652

Bartolini, C., Santos, C., & Ullrich, C. (2018). Property and the cloud. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 358-390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.10.005

Opara-Martins, J. (2017). A decision framework to mitigate vendor lock-in risks in cloud (SaaS category) migration (Doctoral dissertation, Bournemouth University). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/cis.v10n3p29

Culot, G., Nassimbeni, G., Podrecca, M., & Sartor, M. (2021). The ISO/IEC 27001 information security management standard: literature review and theory-based research agenda. The TQM Journal, 33(7), 76-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-09-2020-0202

Greenleaf, G. (2017). Global data privacy laws 2017: 120 national data privacy laws, including Indonesia and Turkey. Including Indonesia and Turkey (January 30, 2017), 145, 10-13.

Bygrave, L. A. (2014). Data privacy law: an international perspective. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199675555.001.0001

Kushner, C. (2010). Regulation of transborder data flows under data protection and privacy law: past, present, and future. TILT Law & Technology Working Paper, (016)

Readership Data+
🌐

Refreshing Cached Analytics Data

The cached analytics data has become stale and ajmrr.org is making a fresh request to fetch the latest data from Google Analytics. This may take 20-30 seconds depending on the server response time from Google Analytics. Please do not close the browser during this time. We appreciate your patience.

Downloads

Published

03-05-2024

How to Cite

Vuppalapaty, Vicrumnaug. “Ethical and Legal Implications of Data Sharing in SaaS Laboratory Management Systems ”. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Review, vol. 5, no. 3, May 2024, pp. 142-63, https://doi.org/10.55662/AJMRR.2024.5306.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 110

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.