Assessing the Impact and Challenges of English Medium Instruction in Saudi Arabian STEM Programs: A Comprehensive Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55662/AJMRR.2024.5401Keywords:
English Medium Instruction, Saudi Arabia, STEM programs, higher education, language policy, educational equity, globalization, Saudi Vision 2030, language acquisition, cultural impactAbstract
In recent years, the adoption of English Medium Instruction (EMI) in non-Anglophone countries has garnered significant attention, particularly within STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) programs. Saudi Arabia, driven by the objectives of Saudi Vision 2030, has implemented EMI across its higher education institutions to foster internationalization and enhance English proficiency among students. This paper reviews the current state of EMI in Saudi STEM programs, drawing on a comprehensive analysis of the socio-cultural, educational, and linguistic contexts. It explores the motivations behind the shift to EMI, the challenges encountered by students and educators, and the broader implications for educational quality and equity.
The transition from Arabic Medium Instruction (AMI) to EMI in Saudi Arabia's STEM disciplines aims to prepare students for global competitiveness. However, this shift presents several challenges. Students often struggle with the sudden change in the medium of instruction, leading to difficulties in understanding complex scientific concepts. Furthermore, the quality of education may be compromised as students and educators navigate the linguistic demands of EMI. The potential cultural and linguistic impact on Arabic language and identity also raises concerns.
This review synthesizes findings from various studies and theoretical frameworks to provide a holistic understanding of the EMI landscape in Saudi Arabia. The paper discusses the strategies employed by students and educators to cope with EMI, including preparatory programs and support mechanisms. It also highlights the role of government policies and institutional practices in shaping the EMI experience.
While EMI aims to elevate the quality of education and English proficiency, it inadvertently creates educational inequalities. Students from private or international schools, who often have better English skills, are at an advantage compared to their peers from state schools. This disparity necessitates a re-evaluation of EMI policies to ensure inclusive and equitable education for all students.
In conclusion, while EMI in Saudi STEM programs holds promise for advancing educational and economic goals, it requires careful consideration of the challenges and implications. Policymakers and educators must collaborate to address these challenges, ensuring that EMI serves as a tool for educational enhancement rather than a barrier to learning. Future research should continue to explore the long-term effects of EMI on student outcomes and the broader educational landscape in Saudi Arabia.
Downloads
References
Al-Harthy, H., & Al-Masri, A. (2018). The challenges of implementing English-medium instruction (EMI) in Omani universities: A case study. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(2), 112-124.
Al-Saedi, S. M. (2018). The necessity and challenges of implementing English-medium instruction (EMI) in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 8(2), 117-130.
Yassin, M. S., & Al-Issa, A. (2019). The challenges and opportunities of English medium instruction (EMI) in the Arab world. International Journal of Innovation and Educational Research, 7(3), 232-243.
Altbach, P. G. (2009). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and benefits. Journal of International Studies, 38(1), 3-25.
Alshaali, M. K., & Alharbi, S. M. (2017). The impact of English medium instruction (EMI) on the academic performance of Saudi engineering students. International Journal of Innovation and Education Research, 5(7), 132-143.
Burns, A. (2010). Teaching science through English: Language acquisition in a science classroom. Routledge.
Clyne, M. (1994). Plurilingual identities and the dynamic integration of language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 15(3), 219-240.
Cowie, A. (1999). The teaching and acquisition of vocabulary. Oxford University Press.
Do Coyle, S., Hood, P., & Marsh, J. (2010). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Heinemann.
Gibbons, P. (2006). Bridging the gap: Scaffolding language learning in multilingual classrooms. Educational Leadership, 63(7), 56-61.
Green, A. (2011). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) in English language teaching. In M.Byram (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching (pp. 104-109). Routledge.
Gu, Q. (2012). The effects of CLIL on university students' English proficiency and subject-matter knowledge System, 40(2), 438-452.
Hornby, A. S. (2000). Oxford advanced learner's dictionary of current English. Oxford University Press.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An overview of cooperative learning. In C. D. Schunk & K. R.Pintrich (Eds.), Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (Vol. 3, pp. 305-345).
Kramsch, C. J. (1998). Language and culture in language learning. Oxford University Press.
Littlewood, D. (1999). Double exposure: Language learning in bilingual environments. Blackwell Publishing
Macaro, E. (2001). Language learning strategies in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. ADLAFL Bulletin, 32(3), 231-245.
Nation, P. S. (2001). Learning vocabulary in language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,21(1), 135-162.
Nguyen, H. T., & Nuqud, A. R. (2016). Exploring the challenges and opportunities of English-medium instruction (EMI) in Vietnamese higher education. Journal of Educational Change, 47(2), 189-212.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of research papers submitted to the Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Review (AJMRR) retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal certain rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and grant the journal a right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, even for commercial purposes, as long as proper attribution is given to the authors and acknowledgment is made of the initial publication in the Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Review. This license allows for the broad dissemination and utilization of research papers.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to institutional repositories or publishing it in books), provided they acknowledge the initial publication of the work in the Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Review.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both prior to and during the submission process to the journal. This practice can lead to productive exchanges and greater citation of published work.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their research papers do not infringe upon the copyright, privacy, or other rights of any third party. The Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Review disclaims any liability or responsibility for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights in the research papers.
How to Cite
